Differential Proteomic Analysis of Ewe’s Milk During Staphylococcal Experimental Intra-Mammary Infections to Evaluate the Impact of Selection on Milk Somatic Cell Count
1Bianchi, L., 1Krupova, Z., 1Miranda, G., 3Rupp, R., 2Foucras, G., 4Rainard, P. and 1Martin, P. 1Génomique & Physiologie de la Lactation, INRA Jouy en Josas, France 2Interactions Hôte Agent Pathogène, UMR 1225, INRA Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire Toulouse, France 3Station Amélioration Génétique des Animaux, INRA Toulouse 4Infectiologie Animale & Santé Publique, INRA Nouzilly, France
Mastitis, defined as inflammation of the mammary gland, usually in
response to infection, can lead to irreversible damage to the secretory
tissue. It results in decreased milk production, abnormalities in milk
inducing altered technological quality, and possible diffusion of
pathogenic bacteria into the food chain. Despite considerable efforts
in selection, prevention and early diagnosis, mastitis remains one of
the most important diseases in dairy cattle and small ruminants
worldwide. With its huge impact both at the economical level and on
animal welfare, methods for early stage detection of clinical or even
subclinical mastitis are still to be found. In dairy small ruminants
the main ethiological agents are Staphylococci.
An extensive differential proteomic analysis of ewe’s milk was
undertaken during the course of mastitis to assess the possible effects
of milk somatic cell count (SCC) on mastitis resistance and to detect
any useful markers of udder infection. To this purpose, two groups of
dairy Lacaune sheep having high (SCC+) and low (SCC-) milk somatic cell
counts were selected and subjected to experimental infection protocols
at one half udder whereas the other one served as control. In trial A,
4 ewes from each group were injected with Staphylococcus aureus. Milk
samples were collected immediately before (d0) and at days 1 (d1) and 7
(d7) after infection. In trial B, 7 ewes from each group were injected
with S. epidermidis. Milk samples were collected immediately before and
at days 1, 3, 7, 10, 15, 22 and 32 after infection. The proteomic
analysis was performed as follows: major milk proteins (both in trial A
and B) and 4% TCA soluble peptides (trial A) were separated by RP-HPLC,
minor whey proteins (trial A) were analysed by two-dimensional LC
(Beckman, PF2D). Relevant fractions were collected and their protein
contents identified by mass spectrometry.
The percentage of major milk proteins was almost unaffected in control
half udders whereas a marked caseinolysis and increased amounts of
serum albumin were observed in the infected quarters. These phenomena
were more apparent in the SCC+ group, suggesting a reduced resistance
to mastitis. In trial A, 2 casein fragments were detected at days 1 and
7 after infection.They were not observed at day 0 and in control
udders. In trial B, it was possible to identify an acute phase protein
(Serum Amyloid A3), early after infection. Among the selected peptides
fractions that were analysed, 10 SAA fragments were also identified.
When analysing minor whey proteins, several proteins (including
lactoferrin, calpastatin, and SAA from Ovis aries and Q6GE43
hypothetical protein from S. aureus), showing differential expression
levels between SCC+ and SCC- ewes, were identified at day 7 after
infection. For each one, a possible role in intra-mammary infection and
inflammation response is proposed.
It was concluded that SCC- ewes might have a better ability to react
against bacterial invasion, as indicated by major protein patterns,
possibly because of different expression of proteins regulating cell
metabolism and inflammation. Moreover, possible markers of mammary
infections were identified amongst proteins and peptide
fractions.

